Aristotle claims that true intellect cannot be achieved without heart, madness, or both
yet it is becoming clear to the point of sterotyping the idea that anyone who considers themselves a guiness slowly isolates themselves human emotion.
the question I'm asking myself here is what do we consider 'smart'
one would think to start with an understanding of what intelligence is, to find a common ground, but that only takes you back to the original question. there different forms of intelligence; anyone who agues this only does so because they feel their form is superior, which is ironic if they follow the stereotypical rules of emotional aban